I HAD A DREAM: 2019 Christchurch Mosque False Flag Attack, A Local View

More Minitrue coming to you...

To the future or to the past, to a time when thought is free, when men are different from one another and do not live alone — to a time when truth exists and what is done cannot be undone: From the age of uniformity, from the age of solitude, from the age of Big Brother, from the age of doublethink — greetings! - George Orwell, 1984

I HAD A DREAM

The Conversation recently published a story¹ presenting new research revealing infamous Christchurch mosque shooter Brendan Tarrant had

for four years before his attack...been posting anonymously but publicly on the online message board 4chan about the need to attack people of colour in locations of “significance”, including places of worship.

I'm not going to review the execrable story or the equally absurd research, you can follow the trail from the link provided if you’re so inclined. I've done it so you don't have to, and by now you’ve probably guessed my opinion: it's meaningless. More an indication of how far the Marxists have gone on their long march through the institutions than a reflection of high quality minds ghosting Auckland’s ivy towers.

The story is a puff piece for some academic yet-to-be peer reviewed² nonsense done under the auspices of Auckland University's Human Participant Ethics Committee. Give me strength. It may be junk as research, but what it is clearly doing is reinforcing a narrative. That narrative essentially boils down to:

Far-right extremists are white, violent, and want to kill lots of non-white people. They use the internet to radicalize themselves and others, and god-damn it they'll soon be coming for you if we don't shut it down. Oh, and if you question this narrative, you're obviously a far-right extremist black/jew/muslim etc. hating piece of white trash...

It's obvious and would be laughable if it wasn't so harmful and wasn't clearly part of an agenda.

Let me give you a different narrative of the events of that day. I wasn’t there, in fact I was busy dying. But I had a dream.

Here’s my dream.

Christchurch is my hometown and I dreamed I believed the official story is a lie from beginning to end? I dreamed I am one of many many locals who agree?

1. Brenton Tarrant’s video was banned in New Zealand almost immediately, and to view or posses the video or question the official narrative is a criminal offense here. Expect an early morning or late night knock on the door.

2. Why did Jacinda Ardern's Labour Government, the Police, and the security services demand the criminalization of the video immediately?

3. because the video showed the official narrative, of this being a solo effort, to be false?

4. because the video showed both other individuals were physically present and very strong circumstantial evidence of Tarrant being under external direction or control?

5. because the video showed a car parked at the main door of the mosque with the driver inside, number plate visible & car identifiable?

6. because Tarrant looked at the car & driver as he entered the mosque?

7. because this car was gone when Tarrant re-emerged from the mosque?

8. because by happenstance there is MSM footage showing this same car being waved unchecked through a Police checkpoint?

9. because this same car was later identified and filmed parked outside a house in Christchurch by a passerby?

10. because the owner of the house was a company with a director who resided at the property?

11. because the company director had ties to the mosque?

12. because the company director moved out of the house within days of the above being identified?

13. because there were election posters on the property’s fence showing local MP and then-Cabinet Minister Megan Woods and then-Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern?³

14. because the car was also visible outside the same property on Google Earth from an earlier time?

15. At this stage I'm convinced people died. I wasn't there but I had an association with the hospital (the joy of having been poisoned then diagnosed with MS⁴) and the information I received was the Emergency Department did receive gunshot victims; some dead or who later died.

16. One witness I know of (second hand info but for me reliable), who was in the park across the road from the mosque entrance during this event, and hid behind a tree, reported their observations to Police. They were harassed and gas-lit until they changed their official story. Because it’s not firsthand I wont report what I heard they said, but I will say that if it’s true they were across the road from the mosque they would have seen the car leave.

None of this work was done by the Police and obviously the official Inquiry didn’t go anywhere near these questions.

But the truth will emerge.

Of course I’ve never seen the Tarrant video footage, because, living in NZ, if I had seen the footage that would be a criminal offence. Possibly even for writing a post like this. We know who the actual criminals are.

But fortunately this all came to me in a dream.

Or maybe it was a Collectivist Nightmare.

1. Christchurch terrorist discussed attacks online a year before carrying them out.
https://theconversation.com/christchurch-terrorist-discussed-attacks-online-a-year-before-carrying-them-out-new-research-reveals-223955

2. Not that peer reviewing means anything. There has been much written about the flaws and corruption of the academic peer reviewing process. Personally, when I hear the words "peer reviewed", for some reason Julian Benda's 1927 book Treason of the Intellectuals springs to mind.

3. If this were true then Megan Woods’ office would have had some connection with the property. This WOULD NOT IN ANY WAY implicate Woods or any of her staff or supporters in the events of that day. An election billboard can result from a simple random knock on the door or maybe the local MP’s office helped a constituent and they had offered the use of their fence. The billboard could be on the fence for any number of reasons.

4.